.

Tuesday, April 2, 2019

Financial Performance Review of Hup Seng Perusahaan Makanan

Financial Performance Re count on of Hup Seng Perusahaan Makanan criticism OF THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCEHup Seng Perusahaan Makanan (M) Sdn.Bhd has performed very strongly in our financial form terminate 31 December, 2008. Not only the revenue has surpassed the RM200 one gazillion million retick for the first time in HSIBs history, lolly forrader tax achieve a discharge game of RM21 million for the financial class ended 31 December, 2008 ontogenesisd from preceding course of instruction corresponding period of RM6 million by a hefty RM15 million or 250%.The aggroups record profit is respectable indeed, considering a challenging operating environment in which blue cost pressures are the order of the day in better vox of the year. By keeping close momentum with volatile movement of major material impairments, the company has promptly reacted with cost rec overy exercises in February 2008 and over again in June 2008 to protect the margin. Nevertheless, sets for well -nigh of the key input materials were falling from historical high towards the end of third quarter impacted by fear of world(prenominal) recession as a result of credit crunch. The continue efforts to enhance operating efficiency within the Group have as well contributed greatly towards the bottom line of the year, best ever achieved in the Groups history. receipts rose by 14% to RM220 million as compared with preceding year corresponding period of RM193 million amid a dishonor output signal volume. The increase was largely due to selected wrong adjustments necessitated by the steep increases in painful material costs.The Group has no borrowings and has a specie balance of RM21 million as at the end of the financial year. Net asset per handle stood at RM2.10 and earnings per share (EPS) improved significantly from 7.9 sen in 2007 to 26.8 sen. mountHup Seng Perusahaan Makanan (M) Sdn. Bhd., established in 1958, has been a household name synonymous with pure tone biscuit ma nufacturing. Today, it is one of Malaysias leading biscuit manufacturers with m all accumulated heavy(p) achievements. Through continuous upgrading, our products have been honoured with numerous awards worldwide, marking important milestones for the companys history. In recognition of Hup Sengs stringent quality anxiety system, the company was awarded the prestigious MS ISO 9002 Quality organisation Certification from SIRIM in 1995 and upgraded to MS ISO 90012000 Quality System Certification in 2003. In 2005, the Prime Minister Dato Seri Abdullah Badawi awarded Hup Seng with the Industry harvest-feast Excellence Award (Eminent Product Performance Award). Being responsible to consumers and upholding Malayan food prestige multinationally, rigorous food sentry go and hygienic restrain strategies are employed to ensure safety and hygiene of products. In mid-2007, Hup Seng was accorded with the HACCP (Hazard analytic thinking Critical Control Points) and BRC (British Retail Cons ortium) Certification. This has educated consumers on food safety and hygiene and at the very(prenominal) time fostered their confidence in Hup Sengs products.With an international foodstuff coverage that spans Asia, Africa, Oceania, Europe and North America, Hup Sengs products have captured the hearts of consumers, early days and old in many corners of the world. Henceforth, Hup Seng shall continue to upgrade, improve and reach clean peaks of excellence.ACHIEVEMENTThe subsidiary, Hup Seng Perusahaan Makanan (M) Sdn Bhd., was accredited with the Certification of HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point) and BRC (British RetailConsortium) in Year 2008.CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITYThe Group recognizes the importance of a corporate culture that emphasizes good corporate social responsibility. The Group is pull to play its role as a caring corporate citizen. In line with this, the Group has taken initiative in making contributions toward the local commwholey, for instances donations to various schools and associations. In the workplace, the Group places high importance on safety, health and employees suppuproportionn. For example, a committee relating to workplace safety is set up to foster awareness of safety in workplace. Various sports activities were organized for healthy and balance working lifestyle for employees besides encouraging networking and socializing between colleagues and peer. outlook AND PROSPECTSMalaysia economic expansion disappeared in fourth quarter 2008 and it barely remained higher up water with a negligible fruit of 0.1 % that led a affluent year growth of 4.6% as compared to 6.3% of 2007. The slower growth was due to the declination global economy that had ca employ a significant drop in the countrys merchandises. The global economy is getting more than critical and all signs indicate deeper and protract recession. Any improvement give hinge on the state of development in the US and other bigger economies in the wo rld. The countrys grossdomestic product see for this year has been revised downwards to between -1% and 1%, from 3.5% earlier. The management persuades 2009 to be another very challenging year for the Group in view of growing global economic un acceptedty. In this environment, the Groups strategy remains pore on product and service quality, flawless ope dimensionn and cost control. At the same time, the Group will continue to look for ways to transmit its competitive position while remaining focused on in operation(p) efficiency so that satisfactory results are achieved in the coming year.FIVE-YEAR concourse FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Financial year ended 31 December RM000 RM000 RM000 RM000 RM000 overthrow 186,482 180,968 188,338 193,115 220,329 Profit After Tax 6,564 5,098 6,807 4,757 16,071 Net Earnings Per Share 11 sen 8.5 sen 11.3sen 7.9sen 26.8 senBoard of theatre directorsKeh (Kerk) Chu KohKeh (Kerk) Chu Koh, Malaysian aged 66, is the hot seat of the Company. He became a portion of the Board of theatre directors on 4 October, 1991 and was official as the Managing managing director on 3August, 2000. Subsequently, he is redesignated as lead on 1 February, 2003. He was the Deputy Managing Director of Hup Seng Perusahaan Makanan (M) Sdn. Bhd. (HSPM) on 13 October, 1974 and then the Managing Director of the same on 1 April, 1977. He was appointed as the Deputy Managing Director on 21 April, 1977 and subsequently the Vice death chair of Hup Seng Hoon Yong Brothers Sdn. Bhd. (HSHY) on 1 January, 1990. He is the brother of Kuo Choo Song and Kerk Chiew Siong, and uncle of Kerk Chian Tung, Teo Lee Teck and Kerk Kar Han. His family relationship with shareholders of HSB Group Sdn. Bhd. (major shareholder of Hup Seng Industries B erhad (HSIB)) is disclosed in page 12 of this Annual Report. He does not have any conflict of interest with the Company invite out for certain recurrent related party transactions of revenue or calling nature that is necessary for day-to-day operations of the Group. He has no convictions for any offences over the past 10 years. As one of the founders of Hup Seng Co., he has approximately 50 years of experience in the biscuits industry. He plans the Groups strategical business development and production development which includes the installation of various production facilities in the Groups factory and heads the research and development team which researches new varieties of biscuits. He contributed in obtaining the Certification of HACCP (Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point) BRC (British Retail Consortium) for HSPM in year 2008, to ensure that product safety and quality are in line with global standard. He travels abroad extensively to keep abreast with the latest develop ments in the biscuits manufacturing industry and to assess new market prospects for the Group.Kerk Chiew SiongKerk Chiew Siong, Malaysian aged 56, became a member of the Board of Directors on 4 October, 1991 and was appointed as an Executive Director on 3 August, 2000. His position as ExecutiveDirector was redesignated to Non-Executive Director on 1 February, 2003. On 17 August, 2006, he then became the Non-Executive Vice Chairman of the Company. He was appointed as the Director of HSPM on 12 March, 1981 and then as an Executive Director on 1 January, 1990 before being redesignated as Vice Chairman on 1 February, 2003. He was a Director of HSHY on 15 February, 1988 and then became the Deputy Managing Director of the same on 1 January, 1990 before being redesignated as Executive Director on 1 February, 2003. He is the brother of Kuo Choo Song and Keh (Kerk) Chu Koh, and uncle of Kerk Chian Tung, Teo Lee Teck and Kerk Kar Han. His family relationship with shareholders of HSB Group Sdn . Bhd. (major shareholder of (HSIB) is disclosed in page 12 of this Annual Report. He does not have any conflict of interest with the Company take away for certain recurrent related party transactions of revenue or trading nature that is necessary for day-to-day operations of the Group. He has no convictions for any offences over the past 10 years. He has more than 33 years of experience in the manufacturing and marketing of biscuits. As head of the Quality trust and Business Development Department, he is responsible for devising strategies for market development and researching the potentials of the Groups products in existing as well as new markets. He overly ensures the Groups biscuits manufacturing quality control system meets the MS ISO90012000 requirements.Kuo Choo SongKuo Choo Song, Malaysian aged 77, is the Managing Director of the Company. He became a member of the Board of Directors on 4 October, 1991 and was appointed as the Executive Chairman of the Company on 3 Augus t, 2000. Subsequently, he is redesignated as Managing Director in HSIB on 1 February, 2003. He had been a member of the Audit Committee until 12 December, 2007. He was appointed as the Managing Director of HSPM on 13 October, 1974 and as the Chairman of the same since 1 April, 1977. He was subsequently redesignated as Vice Chairman of HSPM on 1 February, 2003. He has been the Chairman of HSHY since 21 April, 1977. He has over 50 years of experience in the biscuits industry at management and board levels. He is one of the founders of Hup Seng Co. which was established in 1958 and subsequently became HSPM in 1974. He is the elder brother of Keh (Kerk) Chu Koh and Kerk Chiew Siong, and uncle of Kerk Chian Tung, Teo Lee Teck and Kerk Kar Han. His family relationship with shareholders of HSB Group Sdn. Bhd. (major shareholder of HSIB) is disclosedin page 12 of this Annual Report. He does not have any conflict of interest with the Company except for certain recurrent related party transac tions of revenue or trading nature that is necessary for day-to-day operations of the Group. He has no convictions for any offences over the past 10 years. His job responsibilities include think the Hup Seng Groups business development programs and representing the Group at various external functions. another(prenominal) are Kerk Chian Tung(Executive Director),Teo Lee Teck(Non-Executive Director), Kerk Kar Han(Non-Executive Director), Woon Chin Chan(Independent Non-Executive Director),Norita stash awayti Jaafar(Independent Non-Executive Director), Mazrina Binti Arifin(Independent Non-Executive Director),Raja Khairul Anuar Bin Raja Mokhtar(Non-Executive Director) and Wee Hoe Soon Gooi Hoe Soon(Alternate Director to Woon Chin Chan).Distribution NetworkBesides the domestic market, We also export our products to over 40 countries in Asia, Europe, America, Africa, Mid-Asia etc.We are proud of our record in building profitable and successful business in the most demanding and competit ive of international markets. Our challenge lies in gearing to meet the future tense demands of the markets we serve.PRICE/EARNINGS proportionalityThe legal injury/earnings ratio is a measure of the price paid for a share relative to the annual net income or profit earned by the firm per share. In year 2004, the price/earnings ratio for Hup Seng Industries Berhad is 0.13 generation and increases by 0.05 time to 0.18 time in year 2005. The price/earnings ratio reduces spinal column to 0.13 propagation in year 2006. However, the price/earnings ratio has been increases by 0.03 multiplication again to 0.16 measure in 2007. In year 2008, the price/earnings ratio decreases sharp by 0.12 multiplication to 0.04 propagation only. A higher price/earnings ratio means that investors are pay more for each unit of net income, so the nervous strain is more expensive compared to one with lower price/earnings ratio. Thus, we notice that the stock in year 2008 is the cheapest where the investor will pay less for each unit of net income.PRICE/CASH FLOW RATIO footing/ hard currency liquify ratio is a measure of the markets betations of a firms future financial health. It is calculated by dividing the companys market price by the companys operating capital in flow per share in the most recent fiscal year. In year 2004, the price/cash flow ratio for Hup Seng Industries Berhad is 18.90 quantify. During year 2005, the price/cash flow increases by 1.65 propagation to 20.55 measure. The ratio for 2006 is decreases by 0.95 measure to 19.6 quantify. In year 2007, the price/cash flow ratio is 13.21 times and decreases by 3.66 times to 9.55 times in year 2008. The lower a stocks price/cash flow ratio, the better rank that stock.PRICE/ book of account VALUE RATIOThe price/book esteem ratio is provides an mind of how investors view the firms performance. It is calculated by dividing companys market price by the companys shareholders candour per share. Firms expect to earn high returns relative to their risk typically get by at higher price/book value ratio multiples. In year 2004, the price/book value ratio for Hup Seng Industries Berhad is 1.15 times and increases to 1.21 times by 0.06 times in year 2005. It is decrease by 0.11 times to 1.1 times in year 2006. Then, the price/book value ratio is decreases again to 0.98 times in year 2007. After that, it decreases again to 0.87 times in year 2008. The higher the ratio, the higher the agio the market is volition to pay for the company in a higher place its hard assets.PRICE/SALES RATIOThe price/ sales ratio is a valuation metric for stocks. It used to determine the value of a stock relative to its past performance. It may also be used to determine relative valuation of a sector or the market as a whole. It is calculated by dividing the companys market price by the companys revenue per share in the most recent fiscal year. The price/sales ratio of Hup Seng Industries Berhad for year 2004 is 8.75 times. In year 2005, it rises up to 9.79 times with increases by 1.04 times. In year 2006, it decreases by 0.41 times to 9.38 times. After that, the price/sales ratio decrease sharply by 2.54 times to 6.84 times in year 2007 and decreases again to 5.39 times in year 2008. A low price/sales ratio is usually thought to be a better investiture since the investor is compensable less for each unit of sales.Forecast For Year 2009After we estimated for the growth of 7% for year 2009, we can make the forecast market value for year 2009. In year 2009, we expect that the price/earnings ratio still maintain with 0.04 times which has the same times with year 2008. As a result, the expected market value will decrease to RM1.10. Therefore, we expect the investors still paying less for each unit of net income, so the stock will become cheaper. For the price/cash flow ratio, we expect that it will decrease by 0.63 times to 8.92 times. As a result, the expected market value will decrease t o RM1.10. Thus, the lower of stocks price/cash flow ratio give the better value that stock in year 2009. For the price/book value ratio, we estimate that it will decrease by 0.05 times to 0.82 times which will decrease to RM1.10 in the market value in year 2009. So we estimate that it has the lower premium that market is willing to pay for Hup Seng above its hard assets. For the price/sales ratio, we expect that it will decrease by 0.35 times to 5.04 times. As a result, the expected market value will decrease to RM1.10. Thus, it seem that it will be a better investment opportunity in year 2009 for investors.Other balances Analysis Of Hup Seng Industries Berhad 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Leverage Ratios Interest Burden 1.00 times 1.00 times 1.00 times 1.00 times 1.00 timesLeverage 1.01 times 1.01 times 1.01 times 1. 01 times 1.01 times Compound Leverage Factor 1.01 times 1.01 times 1.01 times 1.01 times 1.01 timesLiquidity Ratios Current Ratio 36.73 times 14.03 times 13.46 times 14.55 times 16.72 times Quick Ratio 36.73 times 14.03 times 13.46 times 14.55 times 16.72 timesCash Ratio 36.28 times 13.99 times 13.39 times 14.47 times 16.69 timesProfitability Ratios Return On Assets 9.57% 9.25% 8.59% 11.35% 13.39% Return On Equity 6.87% 6.08% 6.17% 8.32% 9.97% Profit margin 77.43% 75.74% 73.89% 79.97% 81.92%Comparison With enemy (Hwa Tai Industries Berhad)Hwa Tai Industries Berhad is our strong competitor, so we compare our company with them by ratio analysis which are the ratio as table beneath Hup Seng Industries Berhad Hwa Tai Industries Berhad (Year 2008) (Year 2008) Price/Earnings Ratio 0.04 times (1.12) times Price/Cash Flow Ratio 9.55 times (7.84) timesPrice/ curb Value Ratio 0.87 times 1.28 times Price/Sales Ratio 5.39 times 0.33 times Since Hwa Tai Industries Berhad has net loss, so we cannot compare the price/earnings ratio of our company with it.According to statement of cash flow in Hwa Tai Industries Berhad, we notice that cash outflow is more than cash inflow which indicate negative in net cash flow. Therefore, we unwrap to mak e comparison among these two company.The higher the price/book value ratio, the higher the premium the market is willing to pay for the company above its hard assets. A low ratio may signal a good investment opportunity, so Hup Seng Industries Berhad has a better investment opportunity to investors because the ratio is only 0.87 times which is lower than Hwa Tai Industries Berhad that is 1.28 times of ratio.The price/sales ratio is one of the tools that will help investors determine which crime syndicate a stock is in and help them to make an informed investment decision. The lower the price/sales ratio, the better the investment opportunity. Based on the table above, it shows that Hwa Tai Industries Berhad has a better investment opportunity to investors because it has the lower price/sales ratio than Hup Seng Industries Berhad.As a conclude, a snotty-nosed investor will invest in Hup Seng Industries Berhad to earn more profit because Hup Seng Industries Berhad has high earnings per share which will give investors higher return. Besides that, Hup Seng Industries Berhad also has positive net cash flow which the cash inflow is greater than the cash outflow. As a result, the increasing of reliability of investors towards Hup Seng Industries Berhad will come along investors to invest in this company.

No comments:

Post a Comment