Reliablity vs Validity Essay

The purpose of this weeks dealion is to evaluate and analyze an phrase by identifying issues related to general method dependableness and inclemency. The article that was chosen was Trust in the Face of Conflict The Role of Managerial authentic Behavior and Organizational Context by Korsgaard, M. A. , Brodt, S. E. , & Whitener, E. M. (2002). This paper lead discuss how negative conditions between employees and management pose a risk in self-assurance. Reliabity and hardihood are pertinent in getting a current assessment of how negative conditions can affect the employee morale.Korsgaard, M. A. , Brodt, S. E. , & Whitener, E. M. , wrote an indebt article on trust and negative events and how it relates to management and employee interactions. This article proves that it is essential for management to understand how irresponsible it is to implement trust and willingness to listen to their employees in the workforce. In this article dependability and validity shows to be acc urate due to the overwhelming amount of licence that proves that management needs to implement the changes in order to improve employee morale and willingness to work hard.Reliability referred to the stability of findings on the former(a) hand validity represented the truthfulness of findings (Altheide & Johnson, 1994). The article does not appear to represent single just a quantitative look into or one of a qualitative research so this research must be considered a mixed method approach. There is not numerical terminology displayed in this article but does eat up extensive information on other proven ideas and past research. soft research seeks depth over breadth and attempts to learn subtle nuances of life experiences as opposed to aggregate evidence.Qualitative research is contextual and subjective versus generalizable and objective. (Whittemore, R. , Chase, S. K. , & Mandle, C. L. 2001 p. 524). Because qualitative research is based on entirely different epistemological and ontological assumptions compared to quantitative research, many sense of smell that validity criteria of the quantitative perspective are therefore inappropriate (Hammersly, 1992).Employees perceptions of their managers accepted behavior and of the fairness of HR practices are also likely to have consequences for employee behavior (Korsgaard, M.A. , Brodt, S. E. , & Whitener, E. M. 2002). This article shows how management and staff interaction related in general on how management makes employees feel in the workplace which proves that validity and reliability is burning(prenominal) when researching this topic. Goodwin, L. D. , & Goodwin, W. L. (1984) wrote that many qualitatively oriented evaluators are tempted to disregard the validity and reliability issues that are traditionally associated with quantitative evaluation techniques frequently dilute concerns regarding measurement validity and reliability.Due to this research using both qualitative and quantitative approaches i s necessary to depend on reliability and validity of research because it proves the outcomes of the study. The need to know what validity and reliability is just as important as quantitative and qualitative research. There should remain a think on all four aspects during research to improve the outcomes of progressive research. These efforts will allow better details in the conclusion of research.