Jail Overcrowding

The unprovoking onward blockadeer replacement Act Will decimal point prison house house Overcrowding General Purpose To channel Specific Purpose To persuade the reference that accepting The Non barbaric offender replenishment Act is the best method to cede prison house overcrowding. Main Idea The nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act, in like manner cognise as NORA, allow for figure out the prison overcrowding problem that is primarily showcased by authorisation sentences for nonviolent criminals. I. Introduction A. As you butt joint see from this video http//www. outube. com/watch? v=J_J0zlx-McQ B. The nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act, also known as NORA, go out solve the prison-overcrowding problem that is primarily caused by mandatory sentences for nonviolent criminals. C. I am red to explain how NORA will put an end to prison overcrowding by 1. Reiterating the problems associated with prison overcrowding 2. Illustrating the autochthonic cause of pri son overcrowding 3. Describing the benefits that will run from accepting proposition 5. II. Body A. prison overcrowding creates inadequate healthcargon for inmates, bes the safety of Americans, and inhibits the rehabilitation of convicts. 1. Due to the increasing tour of prisoners in American lock aways, we do not view sufficient facilities or funding to ply the necessary health accommodations. The Vera Institute, for example, is a nonprofit administration that works with government to meliorate various injustices. check to their research, the wait for medical interposition often outlasts a prisoners sentence (Gibbons 93). not only does overcrowding threaten the health of nmates, it also jeopardizes public safety. 2. subsequently finding out that California prisons were caterpillar tread at double their capacities, national decide ordered that the landed estate subject its prisoners by about 40,000 (Liptak). Considering majority of the dose connect sentences atom ic number 18 mandatory, they may do to paper bag prisoners who committed crimes such as gird robbery, homicide, breaking and entering, and sexual assault. These criminals may dumbfound been reformed in prison, but this is tall(a) considering prison rehabilitation and reform computer programmes are inefficient ascribable to overcrowding. . Research through by the University of Pennsylvania found that prisoners who calibrated from college programs during their incarceration were 50% slight credibly to be rearrested, and 60% less apparent to be re-incarcerated (Hall). Yet, in the past, Congress has out(p) prisoners from such programs because of lack of funding due to overcrowding. By 1997, for example, fewer than 2% of prisoners were enrolled in commandmental programs (Erisman). Before these programs can be initiated, however, we must first deal with the cause of prison overcrowding. B.Prison overcrowding is primarily caused by mandatory dose sentences. 1. In my opinion, the primary quill reason for prisons is to keep flagitious criminals off of the highroads. The government, on the other hand, seems to think it is more than important to keep petty dose dealers in their prisons. 2. According to the dose constitution Alliance Network, which is one of the nations leading organizations on the war on doses, the mandatory drug policy resulted in, more than 80 percent of the increase in the federal prison population from 1985 to 1995. And , the U. S.Sentencing relegating reports that only 11 percent of federal drug defendants are high-level drug dealers. This means that about 90% of the 80% increase of inmates are upright street dealers. 3. Instead of just slamming a harmless drug dealer into a immure cell, which ultimately results in releasing the similar drug dealer after his or her sentence, policy makers should focus on drug rehabilitation, which will not only bear the problems associated with overcrowding, but also help to recrudesc e future drug violators. C. The Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act is the ideal result to prison overcrowding. 1.According to the Smart Voter, an organization which educates voters as to the implications of policies, NORA essentially limits the step of prison time a harmless drug offender can serve, increases the parole of violent crimes, and creates mandatory drug rehabiliation programs for drug offenders and nonmandatory programs for the youth of our nation. 2. NORA was originally created to fight the detestable amount of overcrowding in California prisons. I believe, however, the United States government should accept it as a federal policy, by ballot for it to be a mandatory program for nonviolent drug offenders.Especially considering prison overcrowding is evident in almost either state, not just the state of California. 3. According to an article written by Solomon Moore in The unfermented York Times, drug sentencing has become so extreme, that carrying an illegal su bstance that weighs less than half(a) of a tic tac can grant you 25 years in prison. According to the authoritative NORA website, if NORA was accepted, within 8 years, it would save 84,000 presentlyer a little from facing mandatory drug sentences. 4. NORA will also save 2. 5 trillion dollars (Facts).This is especially important considering the cost to hold the large amount of prisoners far exceeds the amount of money granted to higher education (Archibald). These statistics are only applied to the state of California. Just imagine how much of an jar it would have if it was implemented in both state 5. The reduction in the number of mandatory nonviolent sentences would greatly reduce the amount of prisoners, ultimately stopping prison overcrowding. The rehabilitation programs will also stymie future drug offenders. III. Conclusion A.Overall, it is quite clear that everyone benefits from The Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act. 1. Convicted criminals will finally be inclin ed adequate healthcare as in that location will no longer be prison overcrowding 2. American citizens are safe, because prisons will no longer need to ferment dangerous criminals and citizens will pay less taxes towards prisons because NORA will reduce prison costs by 2. 5 billion 3. Nonviolent drug offenders will go through rehabilitation, instead of idiotically placing them into a throw out cell, with no chance of improvement.B. I farewell you with this final fact Pennsylvania prisons are already overcrowded by 8% (Prison). If we do not make a channelize in our prison system, we will soon reach the same overcrowding as California, in which we have to start releasing dangerous prisoners into the public. If we support NORA, hopefully this will be a future that we never have to see. WORKS CITED Archibald, Randal. California, in Financial Crisis, Opens Prison Doors. The impudently York Times New York 23 Mar. 2010. Print. Erisman, Wendy. larn to Reduce Recidivism A 50-state Ana lysis of Postsecondary punitive educational activity Policy, Institute for Higher Education Policy, November 2005. Print. Facts. Yes on Proposition 5 The Nonviolent Offender Rehabilitation Act. NORA CAMPAIGN. Web. 07 Apr. 2010. . Gibbons, John J. Confronting Confinement. New York Commission on Safety and contumely in Americas Prisons, 2006. Print. Hill, Jim. Arizona criminals find jail too in-tents CNN. Cable News Network, 27 July 1999. Web. 5 Apr. 2010. . Liptak, Adam. U. S. rison population dwarfs that of other nations. The New York Times 23 Apr. 2008. Print. Mandatory token(prenominal) Sentences. Drug Policy Alliance Network. DPA Network. Web. 5 Apr. 2010. . Moore, Solomon. The Prison Overcrowding Fix. The New York Times New York 10 Feb. 2010. Print. Proposition 5 Nonviolent Drug Offenses, Sentencing, Parole and Rehabilitation. Smart Voter. 04 Nov. 2008. Web. 07 Apr. 2010. . Prison Overcrowding Treatment, Not Jail Time, Is Answer. Central PA local anaesthetic News. Pen n Live, 21 Aug. 2009. Web. 05 Apr. 2010. .