Call To Action :: essays research papers

chit-chat to ActionImprove nations b anyoting precisely leave control to localsAuthor UnknownSUMMARY A Call to Action is an article from the Houston Chronicle on Thursday, February 20, 2001 informing the nation on the contr everywheresial issue of the nations voter turnouts system. The article begins with the announcement of next months Census Bureau release of the populations data. This means that all the voting boundaries are going to be redrawn and reconfigured. It continues to talk about the surprisingly close and controversial presidential election on November 7th. Difficulties erupted all over the state of Florida and doneout the United States in which the reliability and accuracy of the voter turnout system is questioned. Fortunately, because of the controversial ballots and ballot systems there have been numerous groups and committees nonionic to study and improve our out of date voting system. It says that several stack in Congress are working on multiple bills be c reated to establish nation wide standards for ballot-counting systems. The article states, One U.S. House lawmaker, Beaumont democrat Nick Lampson, wants national standards for voting machines and poll closing times. The author agrees with Lampson in that the voting machines have multiple flaws, one being the problematic bullet card ballots. But he too thinks that the press would throw a fit if there was a national closing time at the polls just for the sake of avoiding early winning announcements. The National friendship of Secretaries of States task force on election standards suggests deviation the enforcement issue to locals but have the government pay for voting machines. They also recommend more voter education, improved training for poll workers and maintaining with-it voter rolls. In the end the author feels that the communities should take on the responsibilities for renewal instead of an all-in-one government plan. He closes by reminding the reader that the nations P resident is elected through the Electoral College and the communities should supervise the voting procedure. credence I agree with the authors view on better the voting system. I believe something needs to be done at least by the next election. In the election of 2000, Florida happened to be the nerve center of the maelstrom. I find it hard to believe that any state that has had problems in the past with voting irregularities would continue to use the same flawed ballot system. Florida continues using a system year after year that allows slew to vote twice on one ballot for the same policy-making office, or that makes the results questionable because the paper might not be punched through enough for the machines to compute the votes?